The Lurker
New Member
Hi, those buds look pretty potent. I think the yield is the only thing you have to work on. I have to say +rep to lurker. I would really consider what he has to say if you want to increase yield. Good luck on your next grow.
Thanks, Bux! Appreciate the complement, my friend.
-------------
DroJo:
-------------
Hi WoF, nice work on that Wheel of yours, I'm interested to see how your current grow turns out. Obviously a lot of effort and thought went into your setup. Thanks for the feedback also. There are several ways to measure yield, and grams/watt-hour takes time into the equation as well, which goes back to efficiency.
I went through my original post to make sure I didn't write something that would be easily misinterpreted; if it was, I apologize. Just to elaborate, the yields I mentioned were for production growing. From my experience, production growers - whether we're talking lettuce, wheat or cannabis - are interested primarily in four things: 1) quality, 2) yield, 3) turnover, and 4) waste (reduction).
Like any business venture, they approach it with the goal of maximizing ROI over time. Yields are definitely not 'average'; in a competitive agri environment they must be better than their competitors to make it commercially viable. So they would definitely be at the upper echelon, relatively speaking. I'm not sure what % of growers this would fall under, but it is certainly going to be a smaller % of the population (per capita).
For most hobby (and non-profit) growers, a reasonable expectation for decent yields with a 400W HPS might be 10-12oz, or .7-.85g/watt - which some of the folks on this forum already produce, as you mentioned. That's still very good, and definitely better than an 'average' yield. Nothing wrong with those numbers, and if it meets their needs, fantastic. Anyone with those kinds of yields are good candidates for testing these LEDs.
(In my experience, your g/watt yields can be higher with smaller fixtures, as you've got more light in a smaller area and less intensity loss at the periphery, so 2oz/sq ft or 1g/watt are more easily achievable w/ 150W HPS than 600W. But you can still get pretty close.)
And - in my mind, you want to find the elite growers, at the top of their game, to do any 'official' testing, if possible - and show exactly what these lights can do, in the right hands. It's a new technology and there's going to be a learning curve - we just want to minimize that during testing as much as possible.
But to set a high (yet achievable) benchmark, I know 1g/watt is realistic - with the right knowledge, genetics, procedures, and environment. You said yourself that you've seen up to 2g/watt; for me, anything above 1.4g/watt is going to be unattainable by most folks, except for the occasional fluke (or perhaps with some vertical growing, which I can't rightly comment on, as I've had no experience with those directly). But 1.0-1.1g on the other hand, while perhaps a high expectation for some, is a good goal to shoot for. And if it's production growing - then yes, that can be done consistently.
And that's exactly the kind of person I want to see doing these comparisons - if we can find one.
Good luck with your 1g/watt goal, WoF! I'd love to see more people get there as well - especially with such cool contraptions!
Regards,
-TL