This sounds like a lovely premise for a children’s bookI was curious to see what might happen to a plant that can't grow.
The plant that couldn’t grow
Graytail's 4th Perpetual: 4x4 Samsung Panels
- Thread starter Graytail
- Start date
The plant that couldn’t grow
eggsman
Well-Known Member
Dang Gray, you sure do have it going on here, never a disappointment stopping in. Thanks.It looks like I took Zam+ just in time - she was starting to grow some nanners. The past couple weeks, she hasn't done much, but the buds got really dense. All the branches ended up draped over the edge of the pot.
It's probably 'cause of all this sticky stuff all over them. Another small harvest but sheesh, I've rarely seen this kind of trich coverage!
overlord
Well-Known Member
Yes I have some of these myself..
Graytail could even be the character trying to help the little fella grow! Lol.This sounds like a lovely premise for a children’s book
The plant that couldn’t grow
- Thread starter
- #426
There'll be a couple of Deadly Sativas going into water this week.
So you got 19 grams out of that little one? Sounds like one of my yields. But hey, those little ones can pack a punch!
Excellent Gray....a few of us running Sats now....
- Thread starter
- #428
I jarred up Zam+ and was surprised to find that it came to 27 grams.
I was hoping for 20+. And when I poured it into the jar I discovered why. Sheesh, that's a quart jar and it usually holds less than 1.5 ounces. Those are some dense lil budlets. 
So that's 27 grams, 0.95 ounces over 141 days = 0.190 grams per day - a bit under my average for a 3 gallon pot.
Morglie
Well-Known Member
Mighty fine sativa buds you've got there.
I jarred up Zam+ and was surprised to find that it came to 27 grams.
So that's 27 grams, 0.95 ounces over 141 days = 0.190 grams per day - a bit under my average for a 3 gallon pot.
- Thread starter
- #430
I'm lovin' the way these small sativas come out. 
They aren't very productive but they're so cute! 
They grow "right", and the produce is better, too.
They aren't very productive but they're so cute! They grow "right", and the produce is better, too.- Thread starter
- #431
I'm going over numbers, and it's clear that these Samsung panels are superior.
This is my first batch of harvests out of this room, and yield totals are up 20% or so. None of my previous light sources did this well. That means I went from 1000 watts of blurples to 670 watts of Samsungs (-33%) and yield went up 20%.
That is significant.
This is my first batch of harvests out of this room, and yield totals are up 20% or so. None of my previous light sources did this well. That means I went from 1000 watts of blurples to 670 watts of Samsungs (-33%) and yield went up 20%.
That is significant.
Derbybud
Well-Known Member
Glad to here your results with the QBs. I just love what they do in my tents. With hardly any heat. That's a good thing this time of year.
Great looking buds there Gray!
Oh those budlets look tasty Gray. Beautiful
And super news on the light, wonderful in fact. It’s a really big difference you worked out there. We’re fortunate to have folks like you paving the way for us ... in many areas. My limited indoor grow area makes me super interested in the small sativas you’re turning out...
And super news on the light, wonderful in fact. It’s a really big difference you worked out there. We’re fortunate to have folks like you paving the way for us
... in many areas. My limited indoor grow area makes me super interested in the small sativas you’re turning out...
Pjs420
Well-Known Member
sheesh, ive been missing out on an awesome grow and some bud porn.... Can't get rid of me now... Those zam+ pics got me hooked! Awesome stuff graytail!
Wow Gray! The Zam is coated. It won't take much of that to get ya going. Nice job!
Killerbudz
Well-Known Member
We're you able to figure out what the savings were on the electric bill?I'm going over numbers, and it's clear that these Samsung panels are superior.
This is my first batch of harvests out of this room, and yield totals are up 20% or so. None of my previous light sources did this well. That means I went from 1000 watts of blurples to 670 watts of Samsungs (-33%) and yield went up 20%.
That is significant.
- Thread starter
- #438
I have low power rates, so 33% isn't a significant cost difference. I suppose I gained $10 a month in the bloom room, $20 overall.
Maybe not overall cost savings, but if you use cost/oz harvested as a metric, between the 20% increase in yield and $10/month reduced cost, I bet you see significant improvement!
- Thread starter
- #440
Maybe not overall cost savings, but if you use cost/oz harvested as a metric, between the 20% increase in yield and $10/month reduced cost, I bet you see significant improvement!
That's true, but for me it was mostly about waste heat, and wide dispersion.
I really didn't anticipate the big increase in yield, even though I knew the lower nugs were better.I am quite pleased!
Similar threads
