cbdhemp808
Well-Known Member
Uh, no. I did answer the question:
"Beautiful plants... good job. If they are females, they should show their sex soon. Keep an eye on the upper nodes on the main stem... females show two little stigmas (white hairs) coming out of bracts on either side of the node..."
Which is true, and doesn't have anything to do with "the photoperiod". When I say "the photoperiod," obviously I'm not making reference to a photoperiod cannabis plant, as in photoperiod plants vs. autoflowering plants. (We call them photos or autos.)
Definition of photoperiod: "the period of time each day during which an organism receives illumination; day length."
Depending on where you are on the Earth, and what time of the year it is, you will have a specific day length, and night length. For a given location, the variation in photoperiod during the year is called the photoperiod cycle.
I grow outdoors and there isn't a switch to flip. When the plants are mature, about 6 or 8 weeks old, gender is usually set and will show then in subtle ways (a pre-flower) and in the plant's growth going forward in various ways, in flowering.
The question at hand is when does a plant first indicate its gender. Plain and simple. With feminized seed, we usually don't think about it. If we grow regular seed (males & females), then we are very interested to know what gender the plants are, as soon as possible.
If you were in Denver, Colorado, and had started growing an outdoor garden of indica plants, on May 1, then by June 15 (let's say) the plants would have indicated their gender. The photoperiod (day length) on June 15 in Denver is about 14.87 hours, and the night length about 9.12 hours. The plants have matured and shown their gender, but the night length is not sufficient to induce flowering. That will happen around mid August when night length reaches 10.5 hours.
So, again, pre-flowering (and gender determination) happens regardless of the photoperiod, and whether or not the plants are going into the flowering phase.
Well, it seems you have been disputing what I'm saying. I think I was fairly clear in my communication, so I think the misunderstand is on your end, my friend. I never said "photoperiod has nothing to do with gender" I originally said, "I don't think showing gender is related to the photoperiod." And then further clarified that, "Showing gender is neither related to, nor caused by the photoperiod – they will show gender regardless of night length."While I am not disputing what you have said, this discussion has mostly been a miscommunication owing to the words used to describe how the plants develop in your experiences. "Photoperiod" can refer to a plant that is not an autoflowering strain. "Photoperiod" also can refer to the day length. Both are correct as a matter of fact. When you say photoperiod has nothing to do with gender, I have to ask myself what it is you are trying to say.
In English, if someone says, "when a plant shows its gender, this is not related to the photoperiod," the use of the word, photoperiod, in this context can only be construed as meaning the photoperiod, which implies the noun, photoperiod, which is defined as day length.
If anyone talks about photoperiod – meaning photoperiod not autoflowering – then they are talking about a photoperiod plant, or photoperiod plants. In this context, photoperiod is a noun modifier that acts like an adjective.
There's no mistaking the difference.
I hope now you understand what I'm conveying.