Fertilizer, NPK, requirements for Cannabis

rippedcb said:
I did look at the AN study results in the calculator tab. Perhaps i'm not reading it correctly? but to me it seems like there was a 50% increase in demand of P and 41% increase in demand of K during flowering compared to Veg? I'm not disagreeing with you that increasing P will not increase the amount of budding sites or bud quantity, but i'm thinking it has an effect on the quality of the fruit/flower. More than just that, i just want to play around and see how it goes, learn, adapt.. improve.
I don't plan on running super high PK numbers. Your calculator is tremendous help. I would be lost without it. I'll keep reading more about MegaCrop and NPK in general.
thanks again :)
Click to expand...

I wouldn't focus too much on % change. Look at the actual numbers that comprise that. The Bloom numbers are:
11800025500128000

Now lets reduce by the common Factor. We get a ratio pf 4.6-1-5. Now lets look at what's already in Mega Crop. 9-6-17. From one of the previous posts, now lets adjust the P & K values to the true amount the fertilizer provided. We have to multiply P by .43 and K by .83. We get 9-2.6-14. Reduced to the common denominator 3.5-1-5. Comparing the first ratio to the second, 4.6-1-5 to 3.5-1-5, we see that we're a little low on N if anything. If you feed up to the 4.6 the plant desires N wise, (ie feeding to keep the foliage the correct Mega Crop Green) then you'll have an excess of P & K, and that's with the base product at the plants highest demands. What would be the point of adding more than the plant can use? The excesses only build up in the growing media and cause issues, or if flushed/watered till good runoff, it just ends up down the drain.
 
Further...

Look at another fertilizer. We'll pick on Dyna Gro Foliage Pro at 9-3-6. Adjust the P & K and its 9-1.3-5. Reduced to the common denominator 6.9-1-3.8, for simplicity we'll call it 7-1-4. Looking at our 4.6-1-5 "optimal ratio in bloom", we'd see we're over on N and under on K. With this fertilizer we could use a "booster" to realign our 7-1-4 and make it closer to the 4.6-1-5 the plant is looking for. The short of it is, Mega Crop already has the booster built in the base product.
 
farside05 said:
6.9-1-3.8,
Click to expand...
farside05 said:
I wouldn't focus too much on % change. Look at the actual numbers that comprise that. The Bloom numbers are:
11800025500128000

Now lets reduce by the common Factor. We get a ratio pf 4.6-1-5. Now lets look at what's already in Mega Crop. 9-6-17. From one of the previous posts, now lets adjust the P & K values to the true amount the fertilizer provided. We have to multiply P by .43 and K by .83. We get 9-2.6-14. Reduced to the common denominator 3.5-1-5. Comparing the first ratio to the second, 4.6-1-5 to 3.5-1-5, we see that we're a little low on N if anything. If you feed up to the 4.6 the plant desires N wise, (ie feeding to keep the foliage the correct Mega Crop Green) then you'll have an excess of P & K, and that's with the base product at the plants highest demands. What would be the point of adding more than the plant can use? The excesses only build up in the growing media and cause issues, or if flushed/watered till good runoff, it just ends up down the drain.
Click to expand...

:adore:

That's why I tagged you guys :) way more experience and knowledge than me. You see, i went about looking at that study very different way. Instead of focusing on the absolute numbers, which i felt would be relative to so many variables (plant age/size, light, ph, environment..) i figured everything else kept the same, the percentage increase of demand would be a better indicator of nutrient needs than absolute numbers. Your arguement makes comeplete sense and thank you so much for taking the time to explain all that.

So by your arguement, MC is TOO high in P (especialy) and K for flowering? Instead of increasing P/K, if anything we should be increasing N a bit? Never knew demand for N was that high after stretch.. i thought i was being overly generous feeding 125ppm of N during flowering.

This is what went in my res last night.. prior to reading your explaination, but i don't think i'm way off..
4x MC (9-6-17)
4x Cal/Mag (2-0-0)
1x sweetCandy (0-17-28)
2x silica (0-0-3)
my numbers according to your spreadsheet are:
N: ~125
P: ~55 x 0.43 = 23.65 =~ 25
K: ~240 x0.83 = 199 = ~200

Thus 5-1-8 .. So not low in N by anymeans, even @ 4gMC, safe with P.. a little high on K (exactly what i wanted, before i read your post)

Do you feel that would cause issues? how would you tweek it? I can see how MC can cause a buildup of P and K over time if people keep overfeeding. Is it because of it being amino-chilated? i mean, typically its obvious when you are over feeding and your plants will let you know in veg, somehow people aren't noticing overfeeding?

last thing.. i keep reading about this "Mega crop green" are plants on megacrop of a different shade? i'm only aware of healthy plant green and plants deficient/toxic of nutrients green.
 
Nevermind my last post.. your calculator already takes in account the conversion factor.. so my math above is wrong. I fed 5-2-9 .. so way too low in N, or too high in P/K as you stated in your post. But my current grow is in its last 2 weeks of flowering, so i'll be fine. I need to figure out this for the next grow though. I'll finish the current grow with my current zillion part liquid nutes.. :straightface:
 
You'll be fine. It's very difficult to not "overfeed P" since most fertilizers have more P than necessary. Just be aware that you could potentially see a build up of it if you don't feed to significant runoff each time or do a periodic, what I like to call, rinse of the medium. I don't necessarily feed to significant runoff each time because to me, that would just be a waste of nutes. Instead, about every 4th water or so, I run a gallon or two of straight tap at them (assuming 5 gallon pot), and then come back with a gallon or two of nutes on top of that. That gets you good enough runoff to clear any nute build up in the growing medium and "reset" things. Of course, in a true hydro setup, things don't build up, its just there if the plant wants to eat it. If it doesn't, then things get unbalanced, and that is solved with the next res change, and you don't have to "rinse". Changing the res becomes the equivalent of a "rinse".

"Mega Crop Green" isn't a color that is specific to Mega Crop only. Some of us like to refer to it as "verdant". It's a nice medium shade green, not too yellow (lacking N) or too dark (forest green meaning too much N). As long as you feed to the point of medium green, there is enough P & K in the base product to take care of any P & K demands in any growth stage. By formulating the product in the manner they have, GLN is basically having you over feed, P & K in veg so that you have enough of it in bloom without having to switch products. Hence why I think it is important to periodically rinse your medium.
 
@farside05 having a little issue with your calculator. I'm not handy with excel at all so i don't know how or what to do. Anyways, having 2 issues:
1) comparing 5g/gal MC numbers to your calculator, everything lines up, except for ZINC (should be 0.78ppm instead of 78ppm), which is way off and it throws all the numbers off.. See screenshot below:
1581700611368.png

1581701887238.png
 
the second issue i'm having is with cal-mag. According to the calculator; 5ml/Gal Cal-mag (i'm using the same as you) should be about 102ppm.. whereas, when i add 5ml/G i get closer to 200ppm (500 standard)
1581702096039.png
 
So i was able to edit/update the numbers in excel to match the new formula of MC and everything else, but still the numbers don't add up to same.. i don't know which calculator to trust lol. @MrSauga if you can help?
 
I think @farside05 @MrSauga the calculations are wrong in the spreadsheet. I used an online calculator for just cal-mag at 4ml/Gallon and i get 168ppm.. which is what my ppm meter was reading at home last night. See below:
1581723665361.png
 
MrSauga said:
I noticed the above image you don't have a value for the P in the sweet candy and the K is incorrect for your version of sweet candy...

(0-17-28)
Click to expand...
The above image (calculation) is just for Cal-mag.. as you can see, all the other rows are 0. Farside had older numbers on the spreadsheet for SC that i didn't bother changing to show you that even just Cal-Mag doesn't add up to ppms (that screenshot is of using his online googlesheets calculator).

But this spreadsheet has taught me what i needed to learn, i can use online calculators to figure out my recipe now. It was just a nicely laid out spreadsheet. Wish i was handy with excel to be able to edit and fix it. Maybe farside can?

what's the specific gravity of MC do you know @MrSauga ?
 
Sorry guys, my mom passed unexpectedly this AM. I'm going to be indisposed for much of the next week and won't be looking at any numbers.
 
So being impatient that i am.. i switched over to MC to finish off the current plants. 46days into flower and approx 2 weeks left to go til finished. This is what i fed them. I know you guys will think these numbers are high in P and K.. but for learning.. here we go :) I'll appreciate any constructive feedback: ~780 elemental PPM's = ~1000ppm on our meters.
1581987495101.png
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2020-02-15-13-24-37-277_com.miui.gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_2020-02-15-13-24-37-277_com.miui.gallery.jpg
    563.6 KB · Views: 73
  • Screenshot_2020-02-15-21-34-22-566_com.miui.gallery.jpg
    Screenshot_2020-02-15-21-34-22-566_com.miui.gallery.jpg
    729 KB · Views: 76
Props to all you guys. I feel like a newb reading all these posts. I want to have a go with the megacrop real soon. Maybe my next run I will be up for the challenge. In my experience every nutrient will achieve decent results. I like approaching each nutrient blind and I just adjust as needed. I know where to come if I have issues. Right here!
:thumb:
 
Back
Top Bottom