Excellent idea, but questionable execution. Given my long term history of employment with the California DHS and involvement in writting regulations, there are several problems with your draft.
Paragraph 5c seems in contravention of existing regulation requirements (which are based on prior law), and would likely be exculpated
Paragraph 6 can't include federal standards, laws or enforcement, as this is a state initiative.
Paragraph 9 would deny the federal gov. the right to the use of local and state law enforcment officers which would most likely violate federal regs or laws
Paragraph II-1 would "grandfather" existing convictions etc. This is prohibited.
Now that's just the first read. Think like they do to beat them.
You may want to involve more legal consults and get this written in a way that will not result in legal battles in US courts.
Paragraph 5c seems in contravention of existing regulation requirements (which are based on prior law), and would likely be exculpated
Paragraph 6 can't include federal standards, laws or enforcement, as this is a state initiative.
Paragraph 9 would deny the federal gov. the right to the use of local and state law enforcment officers which would most likely violate federal regs or laws
Paragraph II-1 would "grandfather" existing convictions etc. This is prohibited.
Now that's just the first read. Think like they do to beat them.
You may want to involve more legal consults and get this written in a way that will not result in legal battles in US courts.