Yes, and my circumstances have been similar for the past 18 years or so. It does make it a challenge to derive useful information from a grow.
Part of me wants to say, "But many people, all running small grows, can list their results and the total can be usefully combined..." However, I suspect that this very thing is what has perpetuated some myths that were only later disproved.
Nonetheless, I believe you to be an intelligent lady who has grown cannabis long enough to have a feel for the thing, and to know - at least on general terms - what to expect. If you make a change and get a different result, you'll probably feel that there is some likelihood of there being a correlation. No, it won't "prove" it, due to the small sample size (placed within a pair of quotation marks because even a relatively large sample size doesn't prove causality with absolute confidence, IMHO). But I value your observations, and assume that others do, too. You seem to pay attention to things, and your wit is sharp .
I'm... not exactly experienced in the art of flattery. How am I doing, lol?
Part of me wants to say, "But many people, all running small grows, can list their results and the total can be usefully combined..." However, I suspect that this very thing is what has perpetuated some myths that were only later disproved.
Nonetheless, I believe you to be an intelligent lady who has grown cannabis long enough to have a feel for the thing, and to know - at least on general terms - what to expect. If you make a change and get a different result, you'll probably feel that there is some likelihood of there being a correlation. No, it won't "prove" it, due to the small sample size (placed within a pair of quotation marks because even a relatively large sample size doesn't prove causality with absolute confidence, IMHO). But I value your observations, and assume that others do, too. You seem to pay attention to things, and your wit is sharp .
I'm... not exactly experienced in the art of flattery. How am I doing, lol?