US Asked To Block Cannabis Clinics Near Massachusetts Schools

Shandar

New Member
US Attorney Carmen Ortiz is weighing whether to use federal law to shut down medical marijuana dispensaries, including those proposed for Boston and Brookline, if they open within 1,000 feet of schools, playgrounds, or public housing.

Under federal law, the 15 dispensaries and additional cultivation sites provisionally approved in Massachusetts could face prosecution and asset forfeiture if they open too close to a school – even if the locations would be allowed under local and state regulations. A Globe review found that at least six of the dispensaries would be within 1,000 feet of schools or playgrounds.

A critic of the Brookline dispensary has appealed to the top federal prosecutor in Massachusetts to intervene, saying it is vital to separate dispensaries from children.

"It raises important questions, and we're going to have to take them into consideration," Ortiz's spokeswoman, Christina DiIorio-Sterling, said. "We are looking into it. We need to assess it and have some internal discussions, and we will have a decision soon."

The scrutiny by federal prosecutors is the latest wrinkle in a protracted and controversial state licensing process for dispensaries. It comes as the state's first medical marijuana dispensaries face inspections and local zoning approvals.

As 23 states and the District of Columbia moved to legalize medical marijuana, tensions flared between federal and state officials. Marijuana remains illegal under federal law, which calls for increased penalties for selling drugs within 1,000 feet of all schools, including colleges; playgrounds; or public housing.

Last year, the Justice Department advised federal prosecutors that enforcement should generally be left to local authorities in states where marijuana has been legalized in some form. But the Justice Department cautioned that preventing marijuana from getting into the hands of children remains a federal priority.

Robert Mikos, a professor of law at Vanderbilt University, said most states have taken the Justice Department advisory to heart and incorporated the 1,000-foot setback into their licensing process.

"In most states, it's a nonissue because part of the licensing agreement is that you don't operate near a school," Mikos said. "Most states have figured one way to quell the concerns is to make sure that these dispensaries don't open near schools."

The Massachusetts Department of Public Health set significantly less stringent guidelines. After voters in 2012 legalized medical use of marijuana, state health regulators crafted rules that prevented dispensaries from opening within 500 feet of schools, day-care centers, or facilities where children frequently congregate.

But cities and towns can adopt even more lenient rules.

A spokesman for the Department of Public Health declined to comment Thursday.

In a Nov. 7 letter to Ortiz, Elizabeth Childs, a Brookline psychiatrist and former state mental health commissioner, complained that New England Treatment Access's proposed dispensary at 160 Washington St., in Brookline, sits within 1,000 feet of two schools, three playgrounds, and a public housing development.

"The state regulations are really problematic," Childs said. "This is a really important step to make sure you separate vulnerable populations from a risky product."

She urged Ortiz to take action, noting that other prosecutors across the country have sent letters to dispensaries and landlords warning they faced federal action if they located within 1,000 feet of schools. Last year, Washington state revised zoning rules for dispensaries selling marijuana for recreational use after the US attorney in Seattle warned of possible federal prosecution.

Arnon Vered, executive director of New England Treatment Access, sent a letter to Brookline's zoning bylaw committee in August 2013 saying the company was aware of the US law and would not locate within 1,000 feet of a school.

"Our recommendation is that the buffer zone should be 1,000 feet," Vered wrote then. "The federal law enforcement community has made it very clear that it will exercise its discretion to enforce federal law regarding cultivation, possession, and sale of marijuana – even medical marijuana – within 1,000 feet of schools."

On Thursday, Terence Burke, a spokesman for New England Treatment Access, said the company shifted its position after Deputy Attorney General James Cole issued a memo on Aug. 29, 2013, advising federal prosecutors that enforcement would generally be left to local authorities where marijuana had been legalized. But that memo said preventing drug distribution to minors remained a priority of the federal government.

"This is a very new industry and over time we became more confident that the 500-foot buffer zone would be in compliance with the new federal guidelines outlined in the second Cole memo and moved ahead with our current location," Burke said.

Patriot Care Corp., which won conditional approval for a marijuana dispensary at 21 Milk St. in Boston, and two others in Greenfield and Lowell, appears to have dispensaries within 1,000 feet of schools in Boston and Greenfield, according to the Globe review. Dennis Kunian, a spokesman for Patriot Care, said that while the company has not had contact with federal authorities, "we would cooperate fully if we did."

Six Massachusetts clinics could conflict with federal law prohibiting the facilities from opening near schools or playgrounds.

Graph of Dispensaries that could be in conflict:

marijuanagrafimage.jpg


News Moderator: Shandar @ 420 MAGAZINE ®
Source: The Boston Globe
Authors: Shelley Murphy, Kay Lazar and Andrew Ba Tran
Contact: The Boston Globe
Website: US attorney urged to crack down on marijuana dispensaries near schools, playgrounds - Metro - The Boston Globe
 
“The state regulations are really problematic,” Childs said. “This is a really important step to make sure you separate vulnerable populations from a risky product.”

Keeping vulnerable populations from a risky product... "But what about the children?"

Look, you can't have a Walgreens and a CVS on every corner in America -- multi-billion dollar, licensed "legal drug" dealers -- and then make restrictions for dispensaries. Remember the prescription drug "epidemic"? Where do you think people get prescription drugs?

And you can't sell beer and alcohol in almost every supermarket and then force dispensaries to operate a certain distance from schools and public housing. I mean, can ya'll see the hypocrisy, or do I need to list additional comparisons?

I read a comment made by a purported doctor on a chronic pain website that said he was afraid the pain management industry will turn into methadone clinics, where pain patients wait in line every day to be served their drug of choice. And so I have to wonder if the people making these zoning restrictions are trying to make that happen -- for all drugs to be placed under one roof, doled out daily (for those of us who need them for pain, or whatever), and distributed from outlets that are 500 feet away from anyone under the age of 21. I can see it now, grandma suffering from arthritis, in line behind Aunt Sally, who's suffering from drug withdrawal.

And just like pharmacies and alcohol distributors that refuse to sell their products illegally, dispensaries will do the same. Why trust the guy behind the counter at 7-Eleven selling vodka and not the budtender selling cannabis?

Sorry, hypocrisy really gives me a headache...
 
that is pretty much word for word my opinion on the subject, too

it blows my mind that people/folk don't accept or see alcohol or prescription drugs as drugs, and view herb as dangerous because it has been labelled as a drug, and made illegal - herd mentality in action...
 
As I was reading this topic, I wondered if this same 1000 ft buffer zone applied to businesses that sold tobacco,alcohol,over the counter drugs and pharmacies also? I can think off hand of 2 stores right next to a high school that sell these things,minus the pharmaceuticals. I have never seen kids walking out with beer and tobacco. There is a pharmacy that might be a thousand feet away but the shopping center that its in is across the street from this school. Why should medical cannabis be any different?
 
I've always wondered how they measure the 1000 feet thing. Is it a radius or a curb measurement? I can see if it weren't defined that you could have all kinds of violations using a radius.

Some people are scared and ignorant, what a monkey wrench.

:peace:
 
Back
Top Bottom