Lets Get a discussion going on LED lighting for the purpose of producing massive high yielding plants.
101 go here and read, Light-emitting diode - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ok issues for growing with LEDS (add as needed)
Wavelengths that plants find most delicious Red and blue, but what wavelength? nm.
From what I can see its around 425nm in the blue and 720nm in the red.
How do LED compare to HID/HPS etc ?
It seems to me from my experience with street lighting that you are talking at least a 3 times drop in wattage is acceptable when comparing traditional high power lighting to LED so about 100W LED = 400W HPS, what do you think?
However this isn't strictly true, as we have Highbay lighting that is a replacement for warehouses, they are 60W and kick out 3900lm, LUX@3m 1490, this is around 12000lm for a traditional light, with a substantially better LUX figure.
Does anyone have real world experience with these things, please contribute!
But then there is the light quality CRI/efficency, if an LED is 100% efficient and packs a high LUX (lm/m2) (which is relevant despite what some websites say) punch than a typical HPS or HID then how is this affecting growing?
It seems logical to think that a large HPS may be cheaper but the waste of power is great, especially when you compare specified output and real out put, has any actaully tested their lights to see if they come close to specified output?
I have read on a light website, that LUX and lumens are irrelevant for growers, really? The site says that the only relevant figures are wavelength, ok!
But if you have a light that produces the perfect red wavelength say 425nm and has a lm output of one, and another light has the same wavelength and a lm output of 100, which one do we think is better?
I smell a little BS.
What is the coverage you desire? A typical HPS has what kind of light beam angle? or you use a mounting to achieve what angle? Any ideas how much light is lost when the light is reflected out of the mounting you use?
LEDS come in various angles 10/20/30/60/90/120 and 180 degree with the use of various lenses, and most numbers in between.
What do the experienced among you feel is a good coverage?
What is better intensity or coverage m2? How to balance the two?
Does anyone have access to a light meter, like I was talking about above it would be interesting to find out how much of the light from your 400W HPS actually makes it to the tip of the leaf, in comparison to an LED that is already a focused light source.
When I gt some time I will take some LED sources and make some reading at various levels to see.
We may start to see why there is the ambiguity between LED and HPS for instance as much more light is already focused on the plant compared to the HPS and a ballast or hood, so much less wasted?
Heat and efficiency are givens, for the amount of power you use LED wins hands down, its not worth talking about, for example a 100 lumen 1 watt LED uses 350mA that's 1:1 power and bugger all current drawn.
Cost, break out the hankies, but why? Whats a system going for these days, why do we think they cost that much?
Small LED's the 5mm variety super bright, around 10000mcd max for the red and not much more 8000 mcd for the blue, this is an excellent power output, the kind used in traffic lights and applications like.
For those of you with electrical as well as green thumbs why not build a system, any how to guides or do we think the average Joe will do more than burn his plants but take the neighborhood with him.
Questions questions question, and some answers, I thought it would be nice to have on thread that can bring all the issues together and find some sensible solutions, and give real answers to those mystical questions.
Add as much as you can.
101 go here and read, Light-emitting diode - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Ok issues for growing with LEDS (add as needed)
Wavelengths that plants find most delicious Red and blue, but what wavelength? nm.
From what I can see its around 425nm in the blue and 720nm in the red.
How do LED compare to HID/HPS etc ?
It seems to me from my experience with street lighting that you are talking at least a 3 times drop in wattage is acceptable when comparing traditional high power lighting to LED so about 100W LED = 400W HPS, what do you think?
However this isn't strictly true, as we have Highbay lighting that is a replacement for warehouses, they are 60W and kick out 3900lm, LUX@3m 1490, this is around 12000lm for a traditional light, with a substantially better LUX figure.
Does anyone have real world experience with these things, please contribute!
But then there is the light quality CRI/efficency, if an LED is 100% efficient and packs a high LUX (lm/m2) (which is relevant despite what some websites say) punch than a typical HPS or HID then how is this affecting growing?
It seems logical to think that a large HPS may be cheaper but the waste of power is great, especially when you compare specified output and real out put, has any actaully tested their lights to see if they come close to specified output?
I have read on a light website, that LUX and lumens are irrelevant for growers, really? The site says that the only relevant figures are wavelength, ok!
But if you have a light that produces the perfect red wavelength say 425nm and has a lm output of one, and another light has the same wavelength and a lm output of 100, which one do we think is better?
I smell a little BS.
What is the coverage you desire? A typical HPS has what kind of light beam angle? or you use a mounting to achieve what angle? Any ideas how much light is lost when the light is reflected out of the mounting you use?
LEDS come in various angles 10/20/30/60/90/120 and 180 degree with the use of various lenses, and most numbers in between.
What do the experienced among you feel is a good coverage?
What is better intensity or coverage m2? How to balance the two?
Does anyone have access to a light meter, like I was talking about above it would be interesting to find out how much of the light from your 400W HPS actually makes it to the tip of the leaf, in comparison to an LED that is already a focused light source.
When I gt some time I will take some LED sources and make some reading at various levels to see.
We may start to see why there is the ambiguity between LED and HPS for instance as much more light is already focused on the plant compared to the HPS and a ballast or hood, so much less wasted?
Heat and efficiency are givens, for the amount of power you use LED wins hands down, its not worth talking about, for example a 100 lumen 1 watt LED uses 350mA that's 1:1 power and bugger all current drawn.
Cost, break out the hankies, but why? Whats a system going for these days, why do we think they cost that much?
Small LED's the 5mm variety super bright, around 10000mcd max for the red and not much more 8000 mcd for the blue, this is an excellent power output, the kind used in traffic lights and applications like.
For those of you with electrical as well as green thumbs why not build a system, any how to guides or do we think the average Joe will do more than burn his plants but take the neighborhood with him.
Questions questions question, and some answers, I thought it would be nice to have on thread that can bring all the issues together and find some sensible solutions, and give real answers to those mystical questions.
Add as much as you can.