GROWant
Well-Known Member
We love that you are is excited as we are. .
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, that's wonderful for you, SweetSue!
And I'll have a chance to get into one of your journals on the very first day (so I'll only have 80 posts to read through initially, instead of 800, LMAO).
I just took a closer look at that particular product. They have an image that shows its PAR footprint. In it, the light is hung at 24" and shows the amounts across a 4'x4' area. There is another graphic that shows the PAR (in the center, directly under the panel) at various heights. At 12", it shows that central "hot spot" as receiving 1,700 µmol/m²/second. That is more than you'd need/want, but same @ 24" looks low (IMHO).
Knowing nothing else, I might tentatively suggest that 18" might be a good compromise to shoot for after initially hanging at a greater distance and acclimating the plant(s). I wish there was an image that showed the output at 18" - and when hung in a room/tent that was only 2'x2'. Assuming highly reflective walls, you'd see (lol) more light available in that 2'x2' space than in the central four square feet of a 4'x4' space, obviously, and this would raise your numbers. But IDK if it would raise them enough to max out the amount of light-energy, to reach the maximum amount that the plant(s) can process - so it is possible that you'd get into the sweet spot where things like temperature and CO₂ level become your limiting factors, rather than the amount of light that the plant is receiving, but I'd still be open to lowering the panel to less than 24".
The lenses and such will play a part, too. IDK how much it matters, but lowering it too much would probably give you areas of discrete(+/-) colored spots instead of one evenly(+/-) mixed light pattern. If that makes any sense.
This is, in actuality, an 80-watt device. On average, I'd discount that (level of wattage) as being adequate for flowering in a 2'x2' space. But with new technology, one never knows.
Are you going to stick your Malawai Gold (or cutting of same)in there and let it have the entire four square foot space? That could be interesting. (But I love sativas .)
Will it be an Osmocote Plus hempy lady? Something else?
You may not have decided yet. And you may wish to surprise us all by saving all of this stuff for the introductory post(s) in your upcoming journal. So I will not be disappointed if you either cannot or do not wish to answer such questions at this time.
I checked on my Train Wreck Auto to see if I should give it a splash of water before repotting later... and realized it has already begun to flower in its 18-ounce Solo cup. . No, I won't be sticking it in the two-gallon container. LMFAO. Either a two-liter bottle or the one-gallon square (but not cubical) pot, methinks. Chronic procrastinators should all grow auto-flowering plants, I suppose, lol?
I checked on my Train Wreck Auto to see if I should give it a splash of water before repotting later... and realized it has already begun to flower in its 18-ounce Solo cup. . No, I won't be sticking it in the two-gallon container. LMFAO. Either a two-liter bottle or the one-gallon square (but not cubical) pot, methinks. Chronic procrastinators should all grow auto-flowering plants, I suppose, lol?
Is this where AKGramma comes in with fists on hips and says, "I TOLD yah so!" Too late to replant now.
Oh CRAP, AKgramma, I forgot all about you! I'm sorry. <~TS~ MAKES A NOTE TO REMIND HIMSELF>
Yes, well... It's really not a big deal. I laughed when I realized(*). It'll just cause a very minor change in a very minor portion of my plans. I am actually tempted to leave it in the cup, just to see what I end up with (and how quickly it'll be ready for harvest). But I'll probably still transplant it, because I assume the stretch, at least, will be larger if there is more room for the roots to grow. As someone (I believe it was SweetSue, but cannot swear to it) told me... Well, I can't remember what was stated, either. Something about going ahead and uppotting it, regardless, IIRC, that it'll end up smaller than if I'd not pulled the bonehead move - but still larger than if I don't bother. IDK, I probably mangled it. I remember some things and forget others with no rhyme or reason to it.
(*) And then called an old friend and told him I had a Train Wreck in flower, and that when it was ready to harvest I'd split it evenly with him . When he got excited, I told him it was only several inches tall and with very little development even for its height. He said, "I'll be sure to bring a rolling paper with me, then."
If I could clone autos, I'd have 20 of them!
We love that you are is excited as we are. .
Oh, that's wonderful for you, SweetSue!
And I'll have a chance to get into one of your journals on the very first day (so I'll only have 80 posts to read through initially, instead of 800, LMAO).
I just took a closer look at that particular product. They have an image that shows its PAR footprint. In it, the light is hung at 24" and shows the amounts across a 4'x4' area. There is another graphic that shows the PAR (in the center, directly under the panel) at various heights. At 12", it shows that central "hot spot" as receiving 1,700 µmol/m²/second. That is more than you'd need/want, but same @ 24" looks low (IMHO).
Knowing nothing else, I might tentatively suggest that 18" might be a good compromise to shoot for after initially hanging at a greater distance and acclimating the plant(s). I wish there was an image that showed the output at 18" - and when hung in a room/tent that was only 2'x2'. Assuming highly reflective walls, you'd see (lol) more light available in that 2'x2' space than in the central four square feet of a 4'x4' space, obviously, and this would raise your numbers. But IDK if it would raise them enough to max out the amount of light-energy, to reach the maximum amount that the plant(s) can process - so it is possible that you'd get into the sweet spot where things like temperature and CO₂ level become your limiting factors, rather than the amount of light that the plant is receiving, but I'd still be open to lowering the panel to less than 24".
The lenses and such will play a part, too. IDK how much it matters, but lowering it too much would probably give you areas of discrete(+/-) colored spots instead of one evenly(+/-) mixed light pattern. If that makes any sense.
This is, in actuality, an 80-watt device. On average, I'd discount that (level of wattage) as being adequate for flowering in a 2'x2' space. But with new technology, one never knows.
Are you going to stick your Malawai Gold (or cutting of same)in there and let it have the entire four square foot space? That could be interesting. (But I love sativas .)
Will it be an Osmocote Plus hempy lady? Something else?
You may not have decided yet. And you may wish to surprise us all by saving all of this stuff for the introductory post(s) in your upcoming journal. So I will not be disappointed if you either cannot or do not wish to answer such questions at this time.
I checked on my Train Wreck Auto to see if I should give it a splash of water before repotting later... and realized it has already begun to flower in its 18-ounce Solo cup. . No, I won't be sticking it in the two-gallon container. LMFAO. Either a two-liter bottle or the one-gallon square (but not cubical) pot, methinks. Chronic procrastinators should all grow auto-flowering plants, I suppose, lol?
Love that shirt Sue, where did you get it?
Pigeons 420 sells them through a site called TeeSprings, I believe. I can track it down for you. I'm on my way to check out his latest YouTube video right now. It's great quality too.
Sue
where are you going to use the new light?
It looks real similar to the Intellegent grow LEDs Icemud was using a few years back.
perhaps not the biggest yielder I have seen Sue, but what a beautiful plant!
Technically, you can. Obviously, they'll be the same age as the mother, so it would appear to be a pointless activity.
I'll be planting some in small containers at a dense spacing, so I will most likely be removing lower branches. IF there is any room (with luck there won't be ), I might stick several of them into a small rectangular pot I have. Assuming that they all root and grow...
...they'll probably only produce a gram or three each. But if I have five, that's five to 15 grams - produced from "waste."
If there isn't room, I'll probably still root one as a curiosity. But that won't add to my knowledge, because it'll just be somewhere in the house, cold and terribly under-illuminated (so I wouldn't expect it to produce in any event).
I do find myself wondering... if one of those lower branches were stuck into a large - deep - container of soil mix, after it roots, would the plant become larger than expected because the roots will be able to grow downwards, at least for a time, before meeting the obstruction of the bottom of the pot? Following generally accepted belief, no, because it'd already be on its way to the end by the time that the branch formed in the first place and then had time to root. However... I would not care to bet one way or the other.
Incidentally, I won't be starting my next installment of the perpetual until Sunday. For some reason my spirit likes to start new threads on Sunday. Why fight natural forces, eh?