I wish when researchers start suggesting dose strengths that they would be more specific about what conditions they are referring to. Will this dose work as well for cancer as it does for PSTD or some other condition? Who knows? In fact, it seems that fighting actual cancer, as apposed to treating the conventional treatment side effects, seems to be rarely discussed, outside of clinician discussions. At least from what I can find. Another result of prohibition, I suppose. At any rate, I'll remain skeptical until a number of folks take one for the team and treat an aggressive stage IV cancer with less than 1g CCO per day to see what happens.
I know, I realise I'm not the one diagnosed with cancer but it's still extremely frustrating for me as well since the person I'm trying to help couldn't do any of this research themselves.
It's a bloody joke that we can waste money on studies like whether drunk birds slur their words but something useful like how cannabinoids can treat cancer? Nope.
Anyway, I told SweetSue I wouldn't rant somewhere else, so, getting back on topic, until they do proper testing I'd advise anyone to stick with methods that seem to work. Now isn't the time to start taking lower doses, if it were me I'd be trying to work up to a reasonable dose in whatever method I felt had the greatest bioavailabilty and greatest chance of treating whatever cancer I happened to have...