Sheriff, Judge Take Up Marijuana Debate

The debate on whether California should legalize marijuana went before the Sacramento County Sheriff and a Southern California judge Tuesday.

It's estimated that the taxation of marijuana could generate $1.3 billion dollars in state taxes.

The informal debate between Sheriff John McGinness and Judge James Gray from Orange County was held at a downtown art gallery.

McGinness said he thinks people will avoid taxes by growing more at home.

"An herb that's relatively easy to grow -- people who are going to make regular purchase of it are going to find a way to do so without paying taxes. I just believe that to be the case," McGinness said.

Gray said besides taxes, there would be great savings from less marijuana crime prosecution.

"Literally, the taxpayers of California will save hundreds of millions of dollars that now we are spending in a futile effort to eradicate marijuana, and again, it's the largest cash crop in our state. So you can tell how successful we are in doing that," Gray said.

Both sides agreed the legalization initiative would not eliminate Mexican drug cartels or a marijuana black market. However, Gray said if the measure is approved, gangs would have less drug money.

"They use that as a recruiting tool to get your children involved with juvenile gangs," Gray said.

McGinness said he worries about employers and schools ensuring safe workplaces.

"People may possess, use immediately before and after work. It's very difficult to make a determination as to whether they're under the influence at a given time and if so you can't take action until after something bad has happened," McGinness said.

Californians will vote on the issue in November.

So for, the California marijuana legalization act does not have a proposition number. Those will be given out Monday.


NewsHawk: Ganjarden: 420 MAGAZINE
Source: KCRA Sacramento
Contact: KCRA Sacramento
Copyright: 2010 KCRA.com
Website: Sheriff, Judge Take Up Marijuana Debate

* Thanks to MedicalNeed for submitting this article
 
"An herb that's relatively easy to grow -- people who are going to make regular purchase of it are going to find a way to do so without paying taxes. I just believe that to be the case," McGinness said.

We did not see this on the medical side. Not everyone will grow their own.
 
We did not see this on the medical side. Not everyone will grow their own.

No, but enough will that the value will plummet. Growing is a rather simple process, and once the state removes the risk of arrest people are going to jump all over it. Growing pot is much simpler and cheaper for the individual than brewing beer at home for example.

Some people will still refuse to smoke anything "non-medical" and so the demand for top quality growers will still exist, but look at medical prices in Canada or Northern CA. Top shelf product flips for around $200 an ounce at some dispensaries, so logically, one could conclude that the black market will be less than that. This is what I believe divides the opinions of users, suppliers, and other players.

I couldn't be happier (if it passes). People without a true caregiver are being price raped, but perhaps that is a means to an end.

I believe that the money saved will be in corrections and police enforcement, not tax revenue generated.
 
No, but enough will that the value will plummet. Growing is a rather simple process, and once the state removes the risk of arrest people are going to jump all over it. Growing pot is much simpler and cheaper for the individual than brewing beer at home for example.

Some people will still refuse to smoke anything "non-medical" and so the demand for top quality growers will still exist, but look at medical prices in Canada or Northern CA. Top shelf product flips for around $200 an ounce at some dispensaries, so logically, one could conclude that the black market will be less than that. This is what I believe divides the opinions of users, suppliers, and other players.

I couldn't be happier (if it passes). People without a true caregiver are being price raped, but perhaps that is a means to an end.

I believe that the money saved will be in corrections and police enforcement, not tax revenue generated.

I am sorry Greengo, I should have explained and said that dispensaries/collectives were being proactive and paying taxes.
 
Back
Top Bottom