Bob Loblaw
Well-Known Member
I'm not seeing anyone mention that you can sex your seeds before you grow them. Is this not a viable method? It seems to work for me. I will add that this should be able to be done with a machine.
How To Use Progressive Web App aka PWA On 420 Magazine Forum
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LolI'll have to give it a try. Seems like fems would not be worth the process of making it this works. Thanks it's interesting
I have a usb microscope. Probably would work pretty good. Checkout this sm I was battling them last yearLol
Problem I had wasn't seeing them it's seeing them.....lol
Holding the seed, or positioning it...then viewing it...
Was a pain for sure....guess a mini retractor or something might help....dunno
View media item 1638557Was 25$ on the zon. I use it with my android phoneKind of like a nasty wreck. It is ugly but you can't look away. Great picture. Which one of those USB microscopes are you using? Do you like it?
Your experience is very interesting. I tried selecting seeds based on this method in my current grow. As Chris Scorpio also mentioned, they were a bit of a pain to try and see, so I photographed them and blew them up on the computer screen to get a better look at them.If they ain't perfectly round they ain't female. Any imperfection is either male or hermi. Use magnification, I find it mostly easy and any questionable ones are rejected. I put a questionable one in once and marked it... sure enough it was a boy. Thus I can say it 100% works for me.
Pic 1 the one on the right is female unless that tiny spot at 11 o'clock is an indentation and 1 o'clock?, the center one is male (nowhere near perfectly round), and the left one is hard to tell from that angle is it round or oval I'd likely give it a try looks pretty uniform.Your experience is very interesting. I tried selecting seeds based on this method in my current grow. As Chris Scorpio also mentioned, they were a bit of a pain to try and see, so I photographed them and blew them up on the computer screen to get a better look at them.
However on re-reading what you posted including the original method pics and text. I realize that I only focused on a uniform appearance of the 'crater'. I germinated 4 which turned out as 2 female and 2 male, 50/50. I also gave some to a growing friend who on germinating 5 or 6 and either got all females or only 1 male. So the seeds I selected for him did much better than the ones I selected for myself. He probably thought I was quite clever as I told him I had selected seeds based on this method that was supposed to identify females, altho I wasn't so smart in the picks I made for myself.
But the big difference with what you have done compared to what I did, was you (like the original method says) picked them on also being as perfectly round as possible. I didn't do this so much, instead spending more time peering at the craters and selecting based mostly on that criteria. Your results are very interesting for achieving 100% females. Next season I will try this again, and hopefully do it properly like the instructions specify and see what happens. As it seems to me you can't really lose in giving it a go, unless you get it wrong and pick out the males by mistake!
Just for interest, here are pics of the seeds that I selected for germination based on this method for this season's grow largely based on what I thought were 'good' craters, altho as stated I overlooked the importance of the overall roundness of the seeds. I wonder if these pics are enough for you to see which if any are obviously female by this method as opposed to being questionable in appearance.
I was looking at some seeds under a microscope and I have female seeds that look more oval.