T
The420Guy
Guest
In a different twist on Montezuma's Revenge, a restaurant worker in
Minnesota has been busted for allegedly slipping marijuana into a
policeman's taco, according to the St. Paul Pioneer Press.
Before scarfing down his lunch, Officer Joe Spark caught an eyeful of
something that wasn't lettuce and took a whiff. Spark's assessment: It
"looked and smelled like marijuana."
To get confirmation, the "doobious" victual, purchased at a place called
Taco John's in Little Canada, was taken to the police lab and tested. Bingo
for bud! The results came back pot positive.
As policemen are not typically enamored of getting a mouthful of muggles,
the 19-year-old taco peddler was arrested and faces charges of selling a
controlled substance in the fifth degree. But will that wash?
I spoke to some lawyers and legal experts to see what they thought and all
sized up the case as difficult. "It doesn't look like the guy's selling from
a technically legal point of view," said one law prof I talked with.
Technically, after all, the officer didn't buy marijuana; he bought a taco.
Likewise, the kid didn't sell marijuana; he sold a taco.
You could argue, it was pointed out to me, that the officer bought the
constituent parts of the taco, thus actually purchasing the marijuana. But
that's not really good enough, as becomes clear if you switch the pot with
another foreign object.
If you substituted the marijuana for a mouse, the argument falls apart. If
the officer had ground rodent instead of reefer in his taco, he'd surely
protest that he had purchased ground beef with his lunch, not mouse. The
officer wouldn't have purchased the foreign object; thus, no sale of pot.
What about casting it as a drug buy, like the cop solicited the pot and the
guy sold it? Nope. The officer didn't solicit the pot, so it's not
technically a sale of pot. It's a transfer, it's possession, it's all sorts
of things - including probably the stupidest thing, if he did it, the
suspect has done to date - but it's not a sale of marijuana. (Should the
suspect prevail and like to pay me for my profoundly unprofessional opinion,
he can mail me a check c/o WND.)
Montezuma's Revenge Reversed?
People cheering the bust of suspected Tijuana drug lord Benjamin Arellano
Felix and death of his brother Ram=F3n should put away the noisemakers and
party hats if they think it means anything substantial to the effort to
combat the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S.
Control of the Tijuana cartel's share of the business, thought to be 25
percent of the cocaine entering the American Southwest, is now up for grabs
- - which doesn't mean victory for anyone, just more bloodshed.
Indeed, a suspected lawyer for the Felix brothers - Rodolfo Carrillo, known
as "the amparo (injunction) king" - was found dead outside his apartment
Monday, according to TheNewsMexico.com. Authorities said a single shot to
the head did the trick.
Turmoil in Tijuana has everyone saying two words: Turf war.
"There is no question about that. Look at what Baja California offers these
people - it's a great launching pad for drugs," said DEA special agent
Donald Thornhill. "We've seen cartels come and go and we're staying very
focused on what's happening in Tijuana."
Apparently it never occurred to Thornhill to ask why he keeps seeing them
come and not just go. If he did, he might realize that this fight - as it
now stands - is perpetual and the word "win" is the punch line to an
increasingly deadly joke.
Jail-House Rock
Fifty inmates of Prathum Thani, a prison in Bangkok, Thailand, have formed a
choral group and are about to Britney Spears their way into national stardom
as they kick off a country-wide concert tour this Friday singing anti-drug
ditties. Members of the group, each of whom is jailed for drug offenses,
will be unshackled while on stage and get to wear civilian clothes.
"Prison director Sorasit Jongchareon says the musical revue, 'Songs For Life
To Fight Drugs,' will feature songs written by the inmates themselves and a
Christian group," according to yesterday's Ananova.com. "All the songs
discourage drug use among young people."
In addition to playing parks and schools, the group will play at several of
Thailand's notoriously overcrowded prisons; "there are around 270,000
prisoners crammed into jails designed for 90,000 inmates, most of whom have
drug convictions," reports Ananova.
Most involved are hoping the revue will not feature any solos of "Oops, I
did it Again."
Wise Words
P.J. O'Rourke: "No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of
society. If we're looking for the sources of our troubles, we shouldn't test
people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and
love of power" ("Give War a Chance," p. 110).
St. John Chrysostom: "What? Did the wine, O man, produce this evil? Not the
wine, O man, but the intemperance of such as take an evil delight in it. Say
then, 'Would there were no drunkenness =85,' but if thou say 'Would there=
were
no wine,' thou wilt say, going on by degrees, 'Would there were no steel,
because of the murderers; no night, because of the thieves; no light,
because of the informers; no women, because of the adulteries;' and, in a
word, thou wilt destroy all" (Homilies 57:5).
Newshawk: Help us Help Reform About Us | DrugSense
Pubdate: Thu, 14 Mar 2002
Source: WorldNetDaily (US Web)
Copyright: 2002 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
Contact: letters@worldnetdaily.com
Details: MapInc
Minnesota has been busted for allegedly slipping marijuana into a
policeman's taco, according to the St. Paul Pioneer Press.
Before scarfing down his lunch, Officer Joe Spark caught an eyeful of
something that wasn't lettuce and took a whiff. Spark's assessment: It
"looked and smelled like marijuana."
To get confirmation, the "doobious" victual, purchased at a place called
Taco John's in Little Canada, was taken to the police lab and tested. Bingo
for bud! The results came back pot positive.
As policemen are not typically enamored of getting a mouthful of muggles,
the 19-year-old taco peddler was arrested and faces charges of selling a
controlled substance in the fifth degree. But will that wash?
I spoke to some lawyers and legal experts to see what they thought and all
sized up the case as difficult. "It doesn't look like the guy's selling from
a technically legal point of view," said one law prof I talked with.
Technically, after all, the officer didn't buy marijuana; he bought a taco.
Likewise, the kid didn't sell marijuana; he sold a taco.
You could argue, it was pointed out to me, that the officer bought the
constituent parts of the taco, thus actually purchasing the marijuana. But
that's not really good enough, as becomes clear if you switch the pot with
another foreign object.
If you substituted the marijuana for a mouse, the argument falls apart. If
the officer had ground rodent instead of reefer in his taco, he'd surely
protest that he had purchased ground beef with his lunch, not mouse. The
officer wouldn't have purchased the foreign object; thus, no sale of pot.
What about casting it as a drug buy, like the cop solicited the pot and the
guy sold it? Nope. The officer didn't solicit the pot, so it's not
technically a sale of pot. It's a transfer, it's possession, it's all sorts
of things - including probably the stupidest thing, if he did it, the
suspect has done to date - but it's not a sale of marijuana. (Should the
suspect prevail and like to pay me for my profoundly unprofessional opinion,
he can mail me a check c/o WND.)
Montezuma's Revenge Reversed?
People cheering the bust of suspected Tijuana drug lord Benjamin Arellano
Felix and death of his brother Ram=F3n should put away the noisemakers and
party hats if they think it means anything substantial to the effort to
combat the flow of illicit drugs into the U.S.
Control of the Tijuana cartel's share of the business, thought to be 25
percent of the cocaine entering the American Southwest, is now up for grabs
- - which doesn't mean victory for anyone, just more bloodshed.
Indeed, a suspected lawyer for the Felix brothers - Rodolfo Carrillo, known
as "the amparo (injunction) king" - was found dead outside his apartment
Monday, according to TheNewsMexico.com. Authorities said a single shot to
the head did the trick.
Turmoil in Tijuana has everyone saying two words: Turf war.
"There is no question about that. Look at what Baja California offers these
people - it's a great launching pad for drugs," said DEA special agent
Donald Thornhill. "We've seen cartels come and go and we're staying very
focused on what's happening in Tijuana."
Apparently it never occurred to Thornhill to ask why he keeps seeing them
come and not just go. If he did, he might realize that this fight - as it
now stands - is perpetual and the word "win" is the punch line to an
increasingly deadly joke.
Jail-House Rock
Fifty inmates of Prathum Thani, a prison in Bangkok, Thailand, have formed a
choral group and are about to Britney Spears their way into national stardom
as they kick off a country-wide concert tour this Friday singing anti-drug
ditties. Members of the group, each of whom is jailed for drug offenses,
will be unshackled while on stage and get to wear civilian clothes.
"Prison director Sorasit Jongchareon says the musical revue, 'Songs For Life
To Fight Drugs,' will feature songs written by the inmates themselves and a
Christian group," according to yesterday's Ananova.com. "All the songs
discourage drug use among young people."
In addition to playing parks and schools, the group will play at several of
Thailand's notoriously overcrowded prisons; "there are around 270,000
prisoners crammed into jails designed for 90,000 inmates, most of whom have
drug convictions," reports Ananova.
Most involved are hoping the revue will not feature any solos of "Oops, I
did it Again."
Wise Words
P.J. O'Rourke: "No drug, not even alcohol, causes the fundamental ills of
society. If we're looking for the sources of our troubles, we shouldn't test
people for drugs, we should test them for stupidity, ignorance, greed and
love of power" ("Give War a Chance," p. 110).
St. John Chrysostom: "What? Did the wine, O man, produce this evil? Not the
wine, O man, but the intemperance of such as take an evil delight in it. Say
then, 'Would there were no drunkenness =85,' but if thou say 'Would there=
were
no wine,' thou wilt say, going on by degrees, 'Would there were no steel,
because of the murderers; no night, because of the thieves; no light,
because of the informers; no women, because of the adulteries;' and, in a
word, thou wilt destroy all" (Homilies 57:5).
Newshawk: Help us Help Reform About Us | DrugSense
Pubdate: Thu, 14 Mar 2002
Source: WorldNetDaily (US Web)
Copyright: 2002 WorldNetDaily.com, Inc.
Contact: letters@worldnetdaily.com
Details: MapInc
