IRS Deal Will Refund Fines To Denver Cannabis Shop That Pays Taxes In Cash

Jacob Redmond

Well-Known Member
The Internal Revenue Service has backed away from a policy that penalized an unbanked marijuana business in Denver for paying taxes in cash, but the federal agency will not say if the approach applies industry-wide.

In a settlement with Denver-based Allgreens, a medical-marijuana dispensary that challenged the agency over its policy, the IRS said it would abate future penalties and will refund about $25,000 of fines the business was forced to pay despite having paid its federal employment withholding on time.

IRS rules require businesses to pay employee withholding electronically or face a 10 percent penalty for cash payments. Although the IRS allows for an abeyance in certain circumstances, it disagreed with Allgreens' position that an inability to get banking services forced it to pay in cash.

The company filed a petition in U.S. Tax Court challenging the penalty, saying it was unfairly applied to a business that was otherwise compliant and paid the taxes in full and on time.

A spokeswoman for the IRS refused to comment on the settlement or its ramifications.

It remains unclear whether the IRS settlement will extend to other marijuana businesses that have been assessed the cash-payment penalty because they could not obtain banking services.

Allgreens' attorney, Rachel Gillette, said it's possible - even likely - other impacted marijuana businesses could benefit.

"If this had gone through to a successful verdict in court, it would be a precedent, but this is a concession and an agreement (the IRS) will abate penalties to those who pay in cash and don't have access to the payments system," Gillette said. "Not applying (the penalty) to other businesses uniformly would be as ludicrous as having applied it in the first place."

Gillette successfully argued that the policy was intended for businesses that refused to be compliant, not as punishment for those that paid on time, yet were forced to bring a briefcase full of cash to the one Denver IRS office that would accept in-person payments.

The IRS told Allgreens that companies have two alternatives to pay electronically - each of which required Allgreens to funnel the cash to a third party who could then make the tax payment on its behalf, "the very definition of money laundering," Gillette said.

A third alternative the IRS suggested - paying the tax in a single lump-sum payment at the end of each quarter - would not only incur the 10 percent penalty but an additional penalty for paying late.

"The taxpayer is entitled to an abatement for reasonable cause, which are circumstances beyond the taxpayer's control, not willful neglect," Gillette said.

That Allgreens "cannot secure a bank account due to current banking laws is not considered reasonable cause to abate the penalty," an IRS hearing officer said.

Gillette said it meant the IRS penalty was "merely punitive and made no sense."

State and local taxes paid in cash do not incur a penalty.

The agreement is the first concession by the federal government to the marijuana industry since it offered guidelines to bankers in February 2014 on how to work with pot shops.

Marijuana remains illegal under federal law and is ranked among the most dangerous of narcotics. A bill has been offered in the U.S. Congress to remove it from the list of Schedule 1 narcotics, which includes heroin and LSD.

Despite the federal banking guidelines, marijuana businesses are still challenged to obtain - and retain - banking services, often resorting to creative methods of disguising what their business really does.

"There are a number of them that have set up holding companies or other methods to assess banking that is not in the actual licensed business's name," Gillette said. "That just makes things very complicated."

Unclear is whether the IRS settlement will extend to all unbanked marijuana businesses or if it will force them each to seek relief in tax court, as Allgreens did.

"It's still not convenient to pay in cash, and this doesn't solve the banking problem. But if more and more businesses line up with cash payments, maybe the federal government is inspired to make a change," Gillette said.

Gillette is also the executive director of the Colorado chapter of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws.

13479.jpg


News Moderator: Jacob Redmond 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: IRS deal will refund fines to Denver pot shop that pays taxes in cash - The Denver Post
Author: David Migoya
Contact: Email newsroom@denverpost.com
Photo Credit: None Found
Website: Colorado Breaking News, Sports, Weather, Traffic, Jobs - The Denver Post
 
To some people that are in favor of legalization, they may skim this article and not think much of it. But, for serious marijuana people (myself included), this is a huge deal! Hopeful this will be brought up by a group businesses so that the IRS will have no choice but to change its ways!
 
To some people that are in favor of legalization, they may skim this article and not think much of it. But, for serious marijuana people (myself included), this is a huge deal! Hopeful this will be brought up by a group businesses so that the IRS will have no choice but to change its ways!

I'm a bit annoyed at being classified as not "serious" .

If you are "serious" and have an issue with cash payments, I recommend you have a tax lawyer request a 'private letter ruling' on your behalf. The way I understand it, this is then a private agreement between you and the IRS that your taxes paid in cash will not incur penalties. Like the settlement in the article, this agreement, if ruled as you hope, applies only to you.
 
I'm a bit annoyed at being classified as not "serious" .

I think he meant more along the lines of "those who really care about every aspect" (Which I would definitely put you in that category, Rad) rather than just recreational readers. I try to post the more thought provoking news and obviously it has provoked some interesting thoughts from the two of you. It's like the article I posted about One Direction the other day. It got a lot of "WTF"s but if you skip past the issue of it being some shitty pop band, you'll see that it was about the country's govt. charging a fee for behavior that didn't even occur within their borders.
 
I'm a bit annoyed at being classified as not "serious" .

If you are "serious" and have an issue with cash payments, I recommend you have a tax lawyer request a 'private letter ruling' on your behalf. The way I understand it, this is then a private agreement between you and the IRS that your taxes paid in cash will not incur penalties. Like the settlement in the article, this agreement, if ruled as you hope, applies only to you.

I hope you didn't take me as being negative towards anyone. I meant serious like Jacob said. It's like someone that buy beer with the highest alcohol content, instead of buying a brand of beer because of taste. I am loyal to a specific brand, but every other I try something new just to see what's out there, that's how I found my new favorite. Sure, I like a good buzz, but if I'm at the grill or watching my Tarheels, I'm going for taste.

Much love and no disrespect intended :)
 
I think he meant more along the lines of "those who really care about every aspect" (Which I would definitely put you in that category, Rad) rather than just recreational readers. I try to post the more thought provoking news and obviously it has provoked some interesting thoughts from the two of you. It's like the article I posted about One Direction the other day. It got a lot of "WTF"s but if you skip past the issue of it being some shitty pop band, you'll see that it was about the country's govt. charging a fee for behavior that didn't even occur within their borders.

Yeah... well I skipped that article. I guess it had more meaning than the title suggested :)
 
I hope you didn't take me as being negative towards anyone. I meant serious like Jacob said. It's like someone that buy beer with the highest alcohol content, instead of buying a brand of beer because of taste. I am loyal to a specific brand, but every other I try something new just to see what's out there, that's how I found my new favorite. Sure, I like a good buzz, but if I'm at the grill or watching my Tarheels, I'm going for taste.

Much love and no disrespect intended :)

I guess I was feeling prickly that day. Sorry.. Thanks all for being nice about it.
 
Back
Top Bottom