Hippies Versus Suits In The Cannabis Industry

Jacob Redmond

Well-Known Member
As marijuana prohibition slowly but surely becomes a thing of the past, the tensions between the radical activists that started the cannabis-freedom movement and the venture capitalists that are looking to cash in on America's No. 1 growth industry are starting to get bigger.

The biggest clash is usually about intent. To most hardcore activists, the pursuit of money without any sense of social responsibility is a futile pursuit, at best, and a venal pursuit at worst. To the suits, the idea that money isn't the first and most important concern doesn't even make sense. Why else would a person start a business unless it was to try to get all of the money they could possibly make by whatever legal means?

This disconnect leads to things such as the makers of Sativex (a cannabis derived medicine that is in the medical-trial phase in many countries) saying they aren't pro-cannabis legalization, because legal marijuana could impact their ability to make money.

As you can imagine, saying this at a cannabis conference to a room full of people that have seen their loved ones sent to prison for possessing and using cannabis doesn't go over very well.

The thing is: Capitalism loves a monopoly and marijuana, by necessity, has always been a decentralized industry. Can these two diametrically opposed systems find common ground?

Not yet. A recent attempt by a group of Ohio capitalists to create a cannabis-legalization framework that would allow only 10 investor groups to be in charge of all of the commercial cannabis cultivation in the state has been widely condemned by most cannabis activists in Ohio. Not only that, the attempt to create an oligopoly also has led to a different group trying to get a more fair law passed. But will these dual efforts split the vote and dilute the cause? I suppose we'll find out this fall.

So, what can be done? I emailed Troy Dayton, CEO of the ArcView group, a cannabis investment firm. The gist of our conversation was that activists will have to fight, perhaps harder than ever, for good and fair regulation.

"As long as we can fight for legislation that offers a fair stake to everyone in the market, then the market will decide whether it buys from people aligned with its values or not," he explained. He conceded that the caliber and smarts of the "suits" competing for business in the cannabis industry "are getting much sharper by the second."

"But I know some pretty damn sharp hippies," he added.

Still, the suits have most of the money and connections. They know how to grease the legislators. And they of course want to make sure that they have every tactical advantage, even before the competition in the marketplace begins. It may not be fair, but it is how business works.

However, the hippies have an advantage or their own: They are already outlaws. If the suits manage to get laws passed that are inherently unfair, there is no guarantee that the hippies and activists will just mindlessly follow along.

The reason the cannabis industry exists is because people were willing to break the law in the pursuit of justice and freedom. Remember, the hippies are the outlaws.

41300.jpg


News Moderator: Jacob Redmond 420 MAGAZINE ®
Full Article: On hippies vs. suits in the cannabis industry - The 420 - Capital Cannabis - April 16, 2015
Author: Ngaio Bealum
Contact: ask420@newsreview.com
Photo Credit: None Found
Website: Sacramento, Chico and Reno News & Review: source for local news and events
 
Finally someone writes an article that makes sense of what`s going on! I kind of see things both ways but I`m an old Hippie and haven`t put on a suit in many years. I support CCHI but I`m also open to some wiggle room when it comes to corporate interests in Cannabis sells, I`m looking for some laws that develop that leave a even playing field between Mom and Pop specialty growers and Corporate growers and also leaves Medical and small personal growers without any Taxes, Controls , or Regulations ( other than certification of organic content) . I`m thinking Mom and Pop should mostly be left out of any Tax , Control and Regulation as long as there sales are derived from 99 or less plants and those who grow over that should be taxed on a sliding scale and be subject to regulations as seen fit by society. I have no problem with large industry as long as they have no problem with small specialty growers. I`m more of a seed vender so both would be my customers !
 
Suits... Scary stuff for us hippies. I've said before that the hippies will win out, that the movement is too grass-roots to be eaten up by the suits, that people will choose mom and pop shops and let this new 420 industry be truly for the people. But idk anymore. Even though we're the outlaws, and we're willing to stay that way if we must, I can't help but feel that the 'system' (Oh god, I'm one of those hippies now :laughtwo:) will just beat us down again. I think we're at a major precipice in this 420 movement in the US and we're either going to crash or soar.

If the Ohio scenario happens, and there's only a small group of people in control of the entire state's cannabis cultivation, sure the hippies can just go back underground and grow their own bud or buy through street dealers... but there's no justice in that. Who really wants to live looking over their shoulder wondering if they might be arrested all because they weren't part of the right investment group? We need to get this right the first time through; if Ohio can set up a nice little green-gold oligopoly, suits everywhere will be paying close attention, and we'll see more of it soon. Let's hope Ohio will do right by us and see the importance of not making this new industry a VIP's-Only club.
 
Back
Top Bottom