Don't Make A Bad Marijuana Law Worse

Rocky Balboa

New Member
Ten years ago, when Oregon voters approved the state's landmark Medical Marijuana Act, they did so with assurances that only a handful of very ill people needed it - perhaps 500 a year, supporters said at the time.

That turned out to be a false promise, as critics warned at the time. They appear to have correctly predicted that the new law would open the door for wider use of pot in Oregon by creating new legal defenses for the possession, use, cultivation and delivery of marijuana.

Statistics strongly suggest this. Today, nearly 16,000 Oregonians hold patient cards entitling them to use marijuana. Nearly 8,000 hold "caregiver cards" so they can possess it, and about 4,000 have permits to grow the plant, resulting in at least 19 tons of marijuana growing legally at any given time.

Not surprisingly, the rate of marijuana use by adult Oregonians is 50 percent higher than the national rate. Voters in 1998 may have thought they were showing compassion for a small number of terminally ill cancer patients who needed marijuana to alleviate their symptoms, but the law is clearly being abused in a big way.

This abuse is showing up in the workplace, where the Oregon drug test failure rate is 50 percent higher than the national rate. And the most prevalent reason for testing failure? Marijuana use -- 71 percent of all positive tests in Oregon, compared with 53 percent nationally.

The 2007 Legislature had a chance to address the workplace issue but fell short. A bill to make it easier for Oregon employers to enforce drug-free workplace policies, even against employees with valid medical marijuana cards, passed in the Senate but faltered in the House.

That was a sensible bill and deserves a second chance in the special session that begins today. Instead, however, the House Business and Labor Committee has put forth a much narrower bill that would give employers the option to regulate medical pot users in only the most dangerous of jobs.

This is a bad bill that will make Oregon's flawed law worse, not better. By giving employers discretion on accommodating medical marijuana use only by workers doing "hazardous duties," the bill would create a huge uncovered class of workers who would win the implicit right to accommodation at work -- something the original act explicitly did not grant.

In other words, this new bill is a Trojan horse. It would exempt such dangerous jobs as mining, logging and blasting, while creating the right to special accommodation for everyone else who might have marijuana cards, including surgeons, bus drivers, nannies and editorial writers.

Legislators should spike this bill. Instead, they should pass Senate Bill 465, clarifying the right of employers to enforce drug-free workplace policies.

And while they're at it, they should fund a Justice Department study of what increasingly appears to be widespread abuse of a well-intentioned medical marijuana law gone bad.

Source: Oregonian, The
Copyright: 2008 The Oregonian
Website: OregonLive.com: Everything Oregon
 
You sound like you aren't an MJ supporter so why are you here? I personally think that it should be deemed unconstitutional for an employer to drug test an employee.
 
I am a Newshawk reporting any cannabis news. I am legalized to smoke in Canada so please don't say I am not a supporter.
 
Well if the Supreme Court has anything to say, it wont matter. Soon drug test for marijuana in pot legal states wouldnt matter.
 
Sorry Rocky, I guess everyone has the right to their own opinion. I could possibly see testing people that could possibly endanger other innocent people with their occupation, but in general, I don't understand why it would matter if the person flipping my burger (no offense to restaurant workers because I've been there) smoked weed 3 weeks ago. The last time I went out to get a job, almost every single place I applied had pre-employment drug tests and much less of them had random drug testing. What's worse is that even though they aren't supposed to, I've heard of companies testing to see if women are pregnant and don't hire the ones that are for fear of taking off mandatory maternity leave. I just don't think that the line was drawn where it should have been on this issue. It's pretty sad too that people that do much stronger drugs that could actually make them a danger to themselves or other people at work only have to quit doing their drugs of choice a few days before their test and some heavy smokers like myself can still fail a drug test a month afterwards.
 
If you have a Medical Marijuana card from a Doctor...:adore:
No 1 should have the right to drug test you for Marijuana... :passitleft:
I think that it should be unconstitutional for any employer to drug test any employee for that" it's fucking bullshit and I don't care what your job is... :theband:

It's on you" to check and see who you are flying with and what the airline flying record is... :cheesygrinsmiley: Just like riding in a car... :rofl:

MV... :smokin:
 
^^ I agree 100%

As I said before, If I crash a plane (and live) test me.

I filled out an application 10 or so years ago and right on the application it asked if I smoked cigarettes. A gave the application back, told the boss what part of my life was his business (my dick) and walked out.

Another application was sent to me in two pages, one was the legal document, one was an optional that had to be returned with the resume and application. The optional asked me if I was married, had kids, was I religious, what religion, did I smoke, all kinds of crap. I filled it all out none of your business and reported them to the U.S. Dept of Labor. Of course they won't hire you if you send back an empty "Optional sheet". I don't know if Longhorn still uses these applications for upper management, but it's ridiculous.

Wait till they can get legal DNA from you. They can toss the application before even reading it, just by seeing you have heart attack risks.
 
I think drug testing would be appropriate for almost any job, ONLY IF: the tests only determined intoxification at work, and included legal drugs. Even as a dedicated stoner, I don't want to work with people who are fucked up, its not safe or productive. But, NO EMPLOYER should EVER have the right to test you for, or judge you on something that you do on your own time.
 
Back
Top Bottom