T
The420Guy
Guest
As the National Post's recent three-part series by Diane Francis
demonstrates, the marijuana industry is alive and well in Canada.
Despite decades of judicial effort to stamp it out, marijuana is
perhaps more readily available than ever. Because marijuana use not
seen by many as posing a health hazard, and because criminal
penalties have long been fixed in proportions that attempt to staunch
supply rather than demand, people have to regard marijuana use as not
a "real" crime.
In a poll for the Post last year, seven out of 10 Canadians said
marijuana possession should be punished with no more than a fine.
Only 21% thought abolishing jail time would be a "bad" or "very bad"
idea, and 10% had no opinion.
Canadians are equally tolerant of marijuana use by elected
politicians. In 1998, 61% of respondents in a poll said it would not
affect their view to discover that a politician had used marijuana in
the preceding year; 3% said they would consider it a plus. A little
over a third of those surveyed said they would be less likely to vote
for a pot smoker, but 83% said they would be less likely to vote for
someone with "a known drinking problem."
Softening public attitudes run parallel to expert opinion.
A 1998 editorial in the British medical journal, The Lancet,
concluded that "moderate indulgence in cannabis has little effect on
health." In May, an editorial in the Canadian Medical Association
Journal said "there are no reported cases of fatal marijuana
overdoses." Arguing that marijuana offenses should be become a civil
matter punishable by a fine "like a traffic violation," the journal
noted that the real harm marijuana users experience takes the form of
lost educational, employment and travel opportunities due to the
criminal record they acquire.
Cannabis decriminalization is favoured by the federally funded
Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, the Association of Canadian
Police Chiefs, and the Canadian Bar Association (the latter has
espoused this position since 1978). "Prohibition has failed" The
Economist magazine declared last week, "the laws on drugs are doing
more harm than good."
In November, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear arguments by three
men who claim that denying adults the right to ingest a substance
less harmful and less addictive than nicotine and alcohol is
unconstitutional. Given that the Ontario Court of Appeal struck down
the federal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act last August, thereby
paving the way for the medical use of cannabis, it is possible the
highest court in the land will hand down a decision that, in effect,
decriminalizes pot.
The judiciary should not make law, but this newspaper would support a
move by politicians to bring the country's marijuana laws into line
with public opinion.
Pubdate: Thu, 16 Aug 2001
Source: National Post (Canada)
Copyright: 2001 Southam Inc.
Contact: letters@nationalpost.com
Website: National Post
Details: MapInc (Cannabis - Canada)
Bookmark: MapInc (Decrim/Legalization)
demonstrates, the marijuana industry is alive and well in Canada.
Despite decades of judicial effort to stamp it out, marijuana is
perhaps more readily available than ever. Because marijuana use not
seen by many as posing a health hazard, and because criminal
penalties have long been fixed in proportions that attempt to staunch
supply rather than demand, people have to regard marijuana use as not
a "real" crime.
In a poll for the Post last year, seven out of 10 Canadians said
marijuana possession should be punished with no more than a fine.
Only 21% thought abolishing jail time would be a "bad" or "very bad"
idea, and 10% had no opinion.
Canadians are equally tolerant of marijuana use by elected
politicians. In 1998, 61% of respondents in a poll said it would not
affect their view to discover that a politician had used marijuana in
the preceding year; 3% said they would consider it a plus. A little
over a third of those surveyed said they would be less likely to vote
for a pot smoker, but 83% said they would be less likely to vote for
someone with "a known drinking problem."
Softening public attitudes run parallel to expert opinion.
A 1998 editorial in the British medical journal, The Lancet,
concluded that "moderate indulgence in cannabis has little effect on
health." In May, an editorial in the Canadian Medical Association
Journal said "there are no reported cases of fatal marijuana
overdoses." Arguing that marijuana offenses should be become a civil
matter punishable by a fine "like a traffic violation," the journal
noted that the real harm marijuana users experience takes the form of
lost educational, employment and travel opportunities due to the
criminal record they acquire.
Cannabis decriminalization is favoured by the federally funded
Canadian Centre on Substance Abuse, the Association of Canadian
Police Chiefs, and the Canadian Bar Association (the latter has
espoused this position since 1978). "Prohibition has failed" The
Economist magazine declared last week, "the laws on drugs are doing
more harm than good."
In November, the Supreme Court of Canada will hear arguments by three
men who claim that denying adults the right to ingest a substance
less harmful and less addictive than nicotine and alcohol is
unconstitutional. Given that the Ontario Court of Appeal struck down
the federal Controlled Drugs and Substances Act last August, thereby
paving the way for the medical use of cannabis, it is possible the
highest court in the land will hand down a decision that, in effect,
decriminalizes pot.
The judiciary should not make law, but this newspaper would support a
move by politicians to bring the country's marijuana laws into line
with public opinion.
Pubdate: Thu, 16 Aug 2001
Source: National Post (Canada)
Copyright: 2001 Southam Inc.
Contact: letters@nationalpost.com
Website: National Post
Details: MapInc (Cannabis - Canada)
Bookmark: MapInc (Decrim/Legalization)