Cannabis Might Treat Diabetes, Says Top Researcher

Ms. RedEye

Well-Known Member
LONDON, (Reuters) - Cannabis plant extracts could potentially form the basic ingredients for a market-leading diabetes drug, the scientist who developed a former world-beating treatment for the condition believes.

Professor Mike Cawthorne led the team that developed GlaxoSmithKline's Avandia, which became the company's second-biggest selling drug until sales plunged in 2007 after a study linked it to a higher risk of heart attacks.
"I sincerely believe it is possible to improve on it (Avandia), and plant-based medicines could be one way to do that," he told Reuters in a telephone interview.

Cawthorne is collaborating with GW Pharma, a specialist developer of cannabis-based medicines, at a new laboratory dedicated to looking for plant-based treatments for diabetes.

The GW Metabolic Research Laboratory will look the different cannabinoid molecules that have been found within the cannabis plant, as well as range of other plants extracts.

There are 60-70 cannabinoid extracts, though only one of those -- THC -- has the psychoactive properties traditionally associated with the plant.

The reseachers will conduct preclinical studies to evaluate them all as possible treatments for diabetes, with a view to getting licensing deals if they strike it lucky.

Cawthorne said that the cannabinoid CBD, used along with THC in GW Pharma's Sativex drug, has been seen to raise levels of 'good' cholesterol in animals.

While 'bad' cholesterol can build up in the blood vessels and cause strokes or heart attacks, 'good' cholesterol is thought to protect against heart attacks.

Chequered History:
Cannabis-related diabetes treatments have a chequered history, with Sanofi-Aventis discontinuing development of its Acomplia obesity drug after European authorities requested that it was withdrawn from sale over fears of psychiatric side effects.

It had been seen as Sanofi's biggest new drug hope, and the withdrawal dealt a blow to CB1 receptor antagonists -- the class of medicines to which Acomplia belonged -- in general.

Cawthorne says he is working with actual cannabis extract rather than its synthetic equivalent, giving the basic ingredients of his potential treatments very different pharmaceutical properties.

The centre would look to treat specific symptoms of diabetes, such as non-alcoholic fatty liver or increased energy expenditure, rather than focusing on specific molecules, which is the route the pharmaceutical industry has taken to date.

"One needs to ... not worry too much about the individual targets, but look and see what individual plant-based materials can do to (treat) the whole disease," he said.

"There really have been relatively few developments in finding new diabetes drug treatments ... This new approach might be more productive in answering the unmet clinical need."


News Hawk: MsRedEye: 420 MAGAZINE ® - Medical Marijuana Publication & Social Networking
Source: Guardian.co.uk
Author: Ben Deighton (Editing by John Stonestreet)
Copyright: 2009 Guardian News and Media Limited
Contact: guardian.co.uk contacts | Information | guardian.co.uk
Website: Business Feed Article | Business | guardian.co.uk
 
I found it very interesting that the prof is using actual cannabis extract rather than its synthetic equivalent. I know from personal experience that Marinol (synthetic THC) for nausea control is an utter failure. It would be nice to know what particular cannabinoids he is using. My opinion is that any synthetic form of cannabinoids can not be as good as the natural form. Good as in the 'healthiest' way and good as in the better 'euphoria'. That seems to be our biggest problem with the FDA. They do not approve of 'natural occurring cannabinoids' but rather synthetic man made cannabinoids. If you think this is for our health and well being you couldn't be more wrong. It is not for the benefit of mankind but rather for the personal bank accounts of the big pharma people. Inhaled marijuana vapors gives immediate relief from chronic nausea and vomiting. Compared to this Marinol is a total failure. Marinol takes over one hour to work and worse yet one does not want to swallow a pill for nausea, not to mention it is even more expensive than legal Medical Marijuana. I suffer from Diabetic Neuropathic Gastroparesis (paralyzed stomach) symptoms are chronic nausea, vomiting and wasting syndrome. I have been on Marinol for years and it is the biggest, most expensive placebo around. I live in a state where marijuana was just rejected by the Iowa Board of Pharmacy due to "Lack of scientific evidence proving the safety and efficacy of marijuana." The fact that 13 states have legalized the use of marijuana for medical purposes does not prove it actual works or is safe. I just about fell off my chair after hearing what Deeann Wedemeyer Olsen, Iowa Borad of Pharmacy member, said regarding the legalization of medical marijuana in those 13 states, "If everybody were to jump off a cliff does that mean you have to?" Now that's real science, I believe it is categorized in scientific circles as "Divine Parental Judgment." I can hardy wait to hear what Judge Novak of Iowa says when the case ends up back in his court as it will sometime soon. The appropriate paper work has already been done to appeal the decision of the IBOP. This would not legalize medical marijuana but would make it easier for SF 293, which would create legal Medical Marijuana for Iowa, to pass in 2010. Keep up the good fight friends. Peace...:peace::smokin:
 
Back
Top Bottom