90% output range is just that. 90% of the power of the output of the LED is within +- 10nm of the LED's peak wavelength. This does very a little from manufacturer to manufacturer, but +-10nm is close. To explain that a little farther, If a company says that the peak wavelength of an LED is 660nm, 90% of all the light produced by that LED will be within the 650nm to 670nm range. As the wavelength covered expands, the intensity decreases. If you are still unsure of what I'm refering to, let me know and I'll post a pic from a datasheet for a visual.
Look at your own post, look at the numbers on your list and the one provided by the other member. I don't see to many matches anyhow lol.
The following will all get at least 90% intensity from the corresponding LED:
660nm
This will hit Chlorophyll A and Allophycocaynin
630nm
This will hit Chlorophyll B and Chlorophyll C1
455nm
This will hit Chlorophyll B, Chlorophyll C1, Chlorophyll C2, Chlorophyll D, and Beta Carotene
610nm
This will hit Phycocyanin
420nm
This will hit Chlorophyll A
730nm
This will hit Chlorophyll F (and achieve the Emerson Effect)
With all that being said, yes he is missing some of the lower blue wavelengths. At the same time so are 95% of the other LED grow lights out there. It can be very difficult to find LEDs below the "Royal Blue" 455nm spectrum. My comment was in respect to the way that you bashed every LED he listed.
I'm not sure you understand my spectrum and thats why your criticizing it.
From your site: "5-band 420-490nm, 510-540nm, 620-690nm" and your "Pro-Bloom" version adds 730-750nm.
Fact is YOU us them too. Yes he does not have the green that you do. You do not give the exact peak spectra that you use. That's understandable. IP, testing, research, competitive edge, and sources are all part of what differentiates companies. However, I do understand the spectra you use. I may agree with them and I may not, but I do understand them fully.