Patent #6630507, assigned to the Department of Health and Human Services, awarded October 7th, 2003. "Cannabinoids as antioxidants and neuroprotectors."
You can read about it at PatentStorm, and you can copy it, change the hxxp to http, and read about it (and it takes some reading, lol). I munged the address instead of putting it live because I'm "kind of" paranoid and with the server being in DC and all I didn't think it entirely wise to have their logs show a bunch of visits with the site referral link being THIS site. They know that we exist, but there's probably no need to repeatedly poke the bear with a stick without good reason, lol. Maybe I'm a little too paranoid. But when they really are out to get you...
Sure they did some research that we wouldn't do - I will never find myself injecting a bunch of rats, killing them, heating their brains, drying their brains, slicing up their brains, and soaking their brains in a cow solution, for example - but I don't think it was right to award them a patent. I might (actually... would) award a patent for some new and never used before process for extracting certain compounds from cannabis, for example, but it's WRONG to award a patent for the actual ingredients of cannabis.
There have already been (many) patents awarded for varieties of food plants. This has hurt many people. Where other governments have made sure to include their peoples' varieties of plants in the world seedbank against need from a disaster or catastrophy, ours awards patents so that companies can decide whether or not you can grow, what you grow, and can force you to give up an heirloom strain that your family created and that has been grown by your family for generations (Google Monsanto).
Aside from that... It's really f*cking hypocritical that the government still takes the position that cannabis has NO medical value (it's designated a Schedule I narcotic) and yet seven years ago they got a patent for medical use! WtF? That's comparable to "removing" another country's dictator who was known to be reforming his country and doing a great many things to help his people, and replacing it with a hand-picked "democratic" ruler who immediately slaughtered many thousands of his citizens. Oh wait, they've done that too.
You can read about it at PatentStorm, and you can copy it, change the hxxp to http, and read about it (and it takes some reading, lol). I munged the address instead of putting it live because I'm "kind of" paranoid and with the server being in DC and all I didn't think it entirely wise to have their logs show a bunch of visits with the site referral link being THIS site. They know that we exist, but there's probably no need to repeatedly poke the bear with a stick without good reason, lol. Maybe I'm a little too paranoid. But when they really are out to get you...
Sure they did some research that we wouldn't do - I will never find myself injecting a bunch of rats, killing them, heating their brains, drying their brains, slicing up their brains, and soaking their brains in a cow solution, for example - but I don't think it was right to award them a patent. I might (actually... would) award a patent for some new and never used before process for extracting certain compounds from cannabis, for example, but it's WRONG to award a patent for the actual ingredients of cannabis.
There have already been (many) patents awarded for varieties of food plants. This has hurt many people. Where other governments have made sure to include their peoples' varieties of plants in the world seedbank against need from a disaster or catastrophy, ours awards patents so that companies can decide whether or not you can grow, what you grow, and can force you to give up an heirloom strain that your family created and that has been grown by your family for generations (Google Monsanto).
Aside from that... It's really f*cking hypocritical that the government still takes the position that cannabis has NO medical value (it's designated a Schedule I narcotic) and yet seven years ago they got a patent for medical use! WtF? That's comparable to "removing" another country's dictator who was known to be reforming his country and doing a great many things to help his people, and replacing it with a hand-picked "democratic" ruler who immediately slaughtered many thousands of his citizens. Oh wait, they've done that too.